Nov 3, 2026 general election · U.S. Senate, Governor, U.S. House and 7 other statewide races
Showing your ballot: Under Michigan law, if a voter shows his or her ballot to anyone other than a person lawfully assisting or an accompanying minor child, the ballot is “rejected for exposure” and the voter may not vote in that election (MCL 168.738(2)). The Print my ballot sheet and the picks saved on your phone are your own notes, not your official ballot; this law concerns the official ballot you mark. Ask your election office if unsure. Source: MCL 168.738 (Michigan Legislature) (accessed Oct 20, 2026)
Election results for Nov 3, 2026: official state sources →
General election: Tuesday, Nov 3, 2026. Dates below are for that election, from official state election sources; rules can change, so confirm with the linked source.
Abdul El-Sayed (D) vs. Mike Rogers (R) + 4 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareJack Bergman (R) vs. Callie Barr (D) + 5 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareJohn Moolenaar (R) vs. Ben Ambrose (D) + 2 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareHillary Scholten (D) vs. Terri DeBoer (R) + 1 other candidate. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareBill Huizenga (R) vs. Sean McCann (D) + 1 other candidate. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareTim Walberg (R) vs. Christian Vukasovich (D) + 3 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareDebbie Dingell (D) vs. Heather Smiley (R) + 4 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareTom Barrett (R) vs. William Lawrence (D) + 1 other candidate. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareKristen McDonald Rivet (D) vs. Thomas J. Smith (R) + 3 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareLisa McClain (R) vs. Ray Pooley (D) + 4 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareMichael Bouchard (R) vs. Christina Bertrand Hines (D) + 3 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareEthan Baker (R) vs. Jeremy Moss (D) + 3 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareRashida Tlaib (D) vs. James D. Hooper (R) + 3 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareT.P. Nykoriak (R) vs. Donavan McKinney (D) + 3 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareJocelyn Benson (D) vs. John James (R) + 3 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareDoug Lloyd (R) vs. Eli Savit (D) + 4 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareAnthony G. Forlini (R) vs. Garlin Gilchrist II (D) + 3 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareCasandra Morse-Bills (N) vs. Jody White (N) + 4 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareTerence Collins (R) vs. Judith Pritchett (D) + 8 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareMichael Schostak (R) vs. Paul Brown (D) + 4 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareRoger Victory (R) vs. Brianna Scott (D) + 8 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareChrista Murphy (R) vs. Richard Mack (D) + 8 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.
CompareAll 148 Michigan legislative races on the Nov 3 ballot, from the official candidate list.
See the racesEvery candidate we list for Michigan's statewide races, with background, positions and votes.
Local and district races: every Michigan county.
Ballot wording is quoted exactly from the Bureau of Elections, which publishes no Yes/No explanation. The Yes/No lines are an AI-written plain-language summary; rely on the official wording. Plain-English summary (Vote Book, from the official Yes/No wording): If approved, a convention of elected delegates is convened in 2027 to draft a general revision of the State Constitution, which would then go to voters for approval or rejection. (The Michigan Constitution puts this question on the ballot every 16 years.) Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording) A Yes vote means: A convention of elected delegates is convened in 2027 to draft a general revision of the State Constitution, which would then go to voters for approval or rejection. (The Michigan Constitution puts this question on the ballot every 16 years.) A No vote means: No convention is convened in 2027; the State Constitution is not put up for general revision. Supporters say: Supporters, including State Rep. Matt Hall (R), argue: “They stuff so many things in this Constitution, all kinds of things, every time... Some of those proposals sounded good, but then had intentions that the public is frustrated about.” Opponents say: Opponents, including Michigan Catholic Conference, argue: “The rationale to vote NO on Proposal 1 is this: State politics have increasingly become nationalized.” Arguments: Ballotpedia (secondary source). Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side. Plain-English summary (Vote Book, from the official Yes/No wording): If approved, the initiated law is adopted: the contribution ban and the expanded disclosure rules described in the ballot wording take effect. Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording) A Yes vote means: The initiated law is adopted: the contribution ban and the expanded disclosure rules described in the ballot wording take effect. A No vote means: The initiated law is not adopted; current campaign finance law stays as it is. Supporters say: Supporters argue voters should approve it so that the change takes effect: The initiated law is adopted: the contribution ban and the expanded disclosure rules described in the ballot wording take effect. Opponents say: Opponents argue voters should reject it and keep current law: The initiated law is not adopted; current campaign finance law stays as it is. Arguments: Vote Book summary of the official Yes/No wording. Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.Proposal 26-1: Constitutional convention
If approved, a convention of elected delegates is convened in 2027 to draft a general revision of the State Constitution, which would then go to voters for a…Official ballot wording
Shall a convention of elected delegates be convened in 2027 to draft a general revision of the State Constitution for presentation to the state’s voters for their approval or rejection?
Proposal 26-2: Campaign contributions and political communications (initiated law)
If approved, the initiated law is adopted: the contribution ban and the expanded disclosure rules described in the ballot wording take effect.Official ballot wording
The proposal would: • Prohibit regulated electric and gas utilities, contractors with over $250,000 annually in government contracts, and people and organizations with substantial connections to these utilities/contractors from making direct or indirect campaign contributions to those who run for or hold offices that impact them. • Expand laws regulating spending on political communications, including those requiring disclosing donor information, to apply to communications clearly identifying candidates or ballot questions, even if they do not expressly advocate voting for/against them. • Expressly apply the law requiring disclosure of who paid for political communications to internet political communications. Should this proposal be adopted?
Know someone voting? Send them this page.