Maryland

Nov 3, 2026 general election · Governor, U.S. House and 3 other statewide races

Phones at the polls: Maryland regulations prohibit electronic communication devices, including cameras and cellphones, in the polling place (COMAR 33.07.04.02). You may not be able to look things up on your phone while you vote, so consider printing a cheat sheet with the Print my ballot button on any race or county page. Paper notes are generally allowed; ask your election office if unsure. Source: NCSL, Secrecy of the Ballot and Ballot Selfies (accessed Oct 20, 2026)

What do you want to see?

← All states

How to vote in Maryland

General election: Tuesday, Nov 3, 2026. Dates below are for that election, from official state election sources; rules can change, so confirm with the linked source.

Registration deadline
Register online or by mail by Oct 13 (mail postmarked by then). Official source (accessed Oct 16, 2026)
Early voting
Early voting Oct 22–29, daily 7 a.m.–8 p.m. Official source (accessed Oct 16, 2026)
Absentee / mail voting
Request a mailed or faxed mail-in ballot by Oct 27, or a print-at-home ballot by Oct 30. Return it postmarked by Nov 3, or drop it off by 8 p.m. that day. Official source (accessed Oct 16, 2026)
Voter ID
Most registered Maryland voters do not need to show ID at the polls; first-time voters who registered by mail without verification and same-day registrants must show an acceptable MVA/government photo ID or a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or government document with name and address. Official source (accessed Oct 16, 2026)
Find your polling place / sample ballot
Official voter lookup (check registration; many states also show your polling place and sample ballot here) · Official state election website (links from the state lists on vote.gov; accessed Oct 16, 2026)
Want only your exact districts in ballot order?
Enter your street address or pick your county (24 counties) and districts to filter out races not on your ballot, choose your candidates, and print a one-page sheet for the booth.
Build my ballot →

On your ballot

U.S. House, District 1 (Andrew Harris running again)

Andrew Harris (R) vs. Dan Schwartz (D). See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

U.S. House, District 2 (John Olszewski Jr. running again)

John Olszewski Jr. (D) vs. Dave Wallace (R). See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

U.S. House, District 3 (Sarah Elfreth running again)

Sarah Elfreth (D) vs. Bernard Flowers (R). See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

U.S. House, District 4 (Glenn Ivey running again)

Glenn Ivey (D) vs. George McDermott (R) + 1 other candidate. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

U.S. House, District 5 (open seat)

Chris Chaffee (R) vs. Adrian Boafo (D). See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

U.S. House, District 6 (April McClain Delaney running again)

April McClain Delaney (D) vs. Robin Ficker (R) + 1 other candidate. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

U.S. House, District 7 (Kweisi Mfume running again)

Kweisi Mfume (D) vs. Scott Collier (R). See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

U.S. House, District 8 (Jamie Raskin running again)

Jamie Raskin (D) vs. Cheryl Riley (R) + 1 other candidate. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

Governor (Wes Moore running again)

Wes Moore (D) vs. Dan Cox (R) + 2 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

Attorney General (Anthony G. Brown running again)

Anthony G. Brown (D) vs. James Rutledge (R). See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

State Comptroller (Brooke Elizabeth Lierman running again)

Brooke Elizabeth Lierman (D) vs. Sonya Dunn (R). See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

Supreme Court Justice, 4th Appellate Circuit (Retention) (Peter K. Killough running again)

Peter K. Killough (NP). See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

State legislature races

All 118 Maryland legislative races on the Nov 3 ballot, from the official candidate list.

See the races

All 24 Maryland counties

Local and district races for every county, with sources.

Pick your county

Candidate profiles

Every candidate we list for Maryland's statewide races, with background, positions and votes.

Governor

U.S. House, District 1

U.S. House, District 2

U.S. House, District 3

U.S. House, District 4

U.S. House, District 5

U.S. House, District 6

U.S. House, District 7

U.S. House, District 8

Attorney General

State Comptroller

Supreme Court Justice, 4th Appellate Circuit (Retention)

Local and district races: every Maryland county.

Know something we’re missing? Tell us: [email protected]. Please include a link to the source (official site, questionnaire, debate or news report). We add positions only with a source and treat every candidate the same way.

Our neutrality promise

Statewide ballot measures (on every Maryland ballot)

3 certified statewide ballot measures on the November 3, 2026 Maryland general election ballot.

Question 1 — State Employee Collective Bargaining and Budget Amendment

Question 1 would amend the Maryland Constitution to require the governor's budget to contain the proposed appropriations necessary to implement the terms and…

Plain-English summary (Ballotpedia, secondary source): Question 1 would amend the Maryland Constitution to require the governor's budget to contain the proposed appropriations necessary to implement the terms and conditions of employment, including wages, hours, fringe benefits, and health benefits, agreed to in each memorandum of understanding (MOU) or binding arbitration between the state, state institutions of higher education, the Maryland Environmental Service (MES), and their respective state employees.

Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording)

A Yes vote means: A " yes " vote supports this amendment to: require the governor's budget to provide for expenditures necessary to implement the terms and conditions of employment, including wages, hours, fringe benefits, and health benefits, agreed to in each memorandum of understanding (MOU) or binding arbitration between the state, state institutions of higher education, the Maryland Environmental Service (MES), and their respective state employees and provide for the statutory changes to collective bargaining for state employees, including requiring the selection of a neutral arbitrator and establishing a binding arbitration process. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

A No vote means: A " no " vote opposes requiring the governor's budget to provide for expenditures for wages, hours, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment provided by a memorandum of understanding covering state employees, and providing for statutory changes to the collective bargaining process for state employees. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Supporters say: Supporters, including Christopher Cano, director of political and legislative affairs of SEIU Local 500, argue: “SB 28 aligns collective bargaining outcomes with Maryland’s constitutional budget process by requiring that each budget include the appropriations necessary to implement the terms and conditions of employment negotiated in memoranda of understanding.”

Opponents say: Opponents, including Sherri Roxas, senior director of labor relations at the University System of Maryland, argue: “While Senate Bill 28 purports to bind the Governor to include appropriations in his budget necessary to fund implementation of all wage and other terms and conditions of employment in each MOU, it is unclear whether the General Assembly would be obligated to ultimately fund those terms.”

Arguments: Ballotpedia (secondary source). Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.

Official ballot wording
Constitutional Amendment (Ch. 155 of the 2026 Legislative Session) Arbitration Reform for State Employees Act of 2026 Providing that each budget submitted by the Governor shall include proposed expenditures necessary to implement wages, hours, fringe benefits, health benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment in each collective bargaining memorandum of understanding with State employees, whether the State and State employees reached those terms and conditions by mutual agreement or through a neutral decider's order. (Amending Article III of the Maryland Constitution) [ ] For the Constitutional Amendment -A vote FOR this amendment means that the Governor has to include money in the proposed State budget to pay for agreements between the State and its employees. Agreements might include changes to wages, hours, fringe benefits, health benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment. The Governor must put enough money in the State budget to cover the agreed upon pay and benefits for employees, whether those terms were negotiated or decided by a neutral decision-maker. [ ] Against the Constitutional Amendment - A vote AGAINST the amendment means that the law about funding agreements between the State and State employees stays the same.

Source: Official ballot text (state election office)

Question 2 — Commission on Judicial Disabilities Vacancies Amendment

If approved, a " yes " vote supports amending the state constitution to authorize the chair of the Commission on Judicial Disabilities to appoint former memb…

Plain-English summary (Vote Book, from the official Yes/No wording): If approved, a " yes " vote supports amending the state constitution to authorize the chair of the Commission on Judicial Disabilities to appoint former members to temporarily fill vacancies or allow the governor to appoint a substitute member or extend the term of an existing member. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording)

A Yes vote means: A " yes " vote supports amending the state constitution to authorize the chair of the Commission on Judicial Disabilities to appoint former members to temporarily fill vacancies or allow the governor to appoint a substitute member or extend the term of an existing member. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

A No vote means: A " no " vote opposes amending the state constitution, thereby maintaining that vacancies on the state Commission on Judicial Disabilities be filled by appointment by the governor with the advice and consent of the state Senate. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Supporters say: Supporters, including Shaoli Sarkar, advocacy director of the Maryland State Bar Association, argue: “HB 788 would allow the Commission Judicial Disabilities, a judicial agency responsible for monitoring the conduct of Maryland judges and justices, to continue its work without delay due to member recusals or vacancies.”

Opponents say: Opponents argue voters should reject it and keep current law: A " no " vote opposes amending the state constitution, thereby maintaining that vacancies on the state Commission on Judicial Disabilities be filled by appointment by the governor with the advice and consent of the state Senate. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Arguments: Ballotpedia (secondary source). Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.

Official ballot wording
Constitutional Amendment (Ch. 878 of the 2026 Legislative Session) Temporary Appointments on the Commission on Judicial Disabilities Authorizing temporary substitute appointments to the Commission on Judicial Disabilities when a member is recused or disqualified, or when a member's term expires. In these situations, the Commission Chair may recall a former member of the Commission, or the Governor, at the request of the Commission Chair, may appoint a temporary substitute member or extend the term of a current member until a permanent replacement is appointed. Only individuals who meet the constitutional eligibility requirements may be recalled or appointed to the Commission. (Amending Article IV of the Maryland Constitution) [ ] For the Constitutional Amendment - A vote FOR this amendment means that temporary appointments to the Commission are allowed if a member is recused, disqualified, or if a member's term ends without a replacement. The Commission Chair can temporarily fill an opening on the Commission with a former member. The Governor can, at the request of the Commission Chair pick a temporary substitute to fill an opening on the Commission or extend the term of a current member until a replacement is appointed. Only individuals who meet the constitutional eligibility requirements may be recalled or appointed to the Commission. [ ] Against the Constitutional Amendment - A vote AGAINST the amendment means that current membership rules for the Commission stay the same. Temporary appointments are not allowed if a member is recused, disqualified, or if a member's term ends.

Source: Official ballot text (state election office)

Question 3 — Provide That Nothing in State Constitution Establishes Criteria for Congressional Redistricting Amendment

If approved, a " yes " vote supports amending the Maryland Constitution concerning congressional redistricting to: provide that constitutional requirements —…

Plain-English summary (Vote Book, from the official Yes/No wording): If approved, a " yes " vote supports amending the Maryland Constitution concerning congressional redistricting to: provide that constitutional requirements — including contiguity, compactness, and equal population — apply only to state legislative districts, not congressional districts; allow the General…

Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording)

A Yes vote means: A " yes " vote supports amending the Maryland Constitution concerning congressional redistricting to: provide that constitutional requirements — including contiguity, compactness, and equal population — apply only to state legislative districts, not congressional districts; allow the General Assembly to grant the Supreme Court of Maryland original jurisdiction over challenges to congressional redistricting plans; and provide that the Maryland Constitution establishes no criteria for congressional district boundaries. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

A No vote means: A " no " vote opposes amending the Maryland Constitution concerning congressional redistricting, leaving unchanged the constitutional language that the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County held in 2022 applied the state’s districting requirements to congressional districts. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Supporters say: Supporters, including Senate President Bill Ferguson (D-46), argue: “During this special session, we are clarifying the rules by which we will draw maps to ensure we are using the standards the state used for decades prior....”

Opponents say: Opponents, including State Del. Christopher Eric Bouchat (R-5), argue: “My hope was that we could balance out what the Democrats are going to pass with Citizens being sovereign over the redistricting process.”

Arguments: Ballotpedia (secondary source). Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.

Official ballot wording
Constitutional Amendment (Ch. 881 of the 2026 Legislative Session) Election Districts FOR the purpose of clarifying that certain requirements apply only to districts for the election of members of the Senate of Maryland and the House of Delegates; authorizing the General Assembly to grant original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court of Maryland to review the congressional districting plan of the State; and providing that nothing in the Maryland Constitution provides applicable criteria for the boundaries of a congressional districting plan. (Amending Article III of the Maryland Constitution) [ ] For the Constitutional Amendment [ ] Against the Constitutional Amendment

Source: Official ballot text (state election office)

Share this guide

Know someone voting? Send them this page.