Louisiana

Nov 3, 2026 general election · U.S. Senate and U.S. House

What do you want to see?

← All states

How to vote in Louisiana

General election: Tuesday, Nov 3, 2026. Dates below are for that election, from official state election sources; rules can change, so confirm with the linked source.

Registration deadline
Register by Oct 5 in person or by mail, or by Oct 13 online. Official source (accessed Oct 16, 2026)
Early voting
Early voting Oct 20–27 (excluding Sunday, Oct 25), 8:30 a.m.–6 p.m. Official source (accessed Oct 16, 2026)
Absentee / mail voting
General and disabled absentee-ballot requests due 4:30 p.m. Oct 30. Official source (accessed Oct 16, 2026)
Voter ID
Be prepared to show a photo ID with your photo and signature, or a U.S. military ID with your name and picture. A free Louisiana special ID card is available. Official source (accessed Oct 16, 2026)
Find your polling place / sample ballot
Polling locations · Official voter lookup (check registration; many states also show your polling place and sample ballot here) · Official state election website (links from the state lists on vote.gov; accessed Oct 16, 2026)
Want only your exact districts in ballot order?
Enter your street address or pick your parish (64 parishes) and districts to filter out races not on your ballot, choose your candidates, and print a one-page sheet for the booth.
Build my ballot →

On your ballot

U.S. Senate (open seat)

Julia Letlow (R) vs. Jamie Davis (D). See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

U.S. House, District 1 (open seat)

Randall Arrington (R) vs. Lauren Jewett (D) + 2 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

U.S. House, District 2 (open seat)

Peter Williams (R) vs. Troy Carter (D) + 3 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

U.S. House, District 3 (open seat)

Clay Higgins (R) vs. John Day (D) + 4 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

U.S. House, District 4 (open seat)

Gordon Heslop (R) vs. Matthew Gromlich (D) + 3 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

U.S. House, District 5 (open seat)

Misti Cordell (R) vs. Patricia Moore (D) + 7 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

U.S. House, District 6 (open seat)

Stephen Wagley (R) vs. Lindsay Garcia (D) + 8 other candidates. See where each candidate stands, in their own words with sources, plus voting records where they exist.

Compare

All 64 Louisiana parishes

Local and district races for every parish, with sources.

Pick your parish

Candidate profiles

Every candidate we list for Louisiana's statewide races, with background, positions and votes.

U.S. Senate

U.S. House, District 1

U.S. House, District 2

U.S. House, District 3

U.S. House, District 4

U.S. House, District 5

U.S. House, District 6

Local and district races: every Louisiana parish.

Know something we’re missing? Tell us: [email protected]. Please include a link to the source (official site, questionnaire, debate or news report). We add positions only with a source and treat every candidate the same way.

Our neutrality promise

Statewide ballot measures (on every Louisiana ballot)

10 certified statewide ballot measures on the November 3, 2026 Louisiana general election ballot.

Amendment 1 — One-Time Transfer of Disabled Veteran Homestead Tax Exemption for Surviving Spouses Amendment

If approved, a "yes" vote supports allowing the surviving spouse of a disabled veteran to transfer the homestead property tax exemption one time to a new hom…

Plain-English summary (Vote Book, from the official Yes/No wording): If approved, a "yes" vote supports allowing the surviving spouse of a disabled veteran to transfer the homestead property tax exemption one time to a new homestead. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording)

A Yes vote means: A "yes" vote supports allowing the surviving spouse of a disabled veteran to transfer the homestead property tax exemption one time to a new homestead. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

A No vote means: A "no" vote opposes allowing the surviving spouse of a disabled veteran to transfer the homestead property tax exemption one time to a new homestead. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Supporters say: Supporters argue voters should approve it so that the change takes effect: supports allowing the surviving spouse of a disabled veteran to transfer the homestead property tax exemption one time to a new homestead. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Opponents say: Opponents, including The Power Coalition for Equity & Justice, argue: “We support veterans and their families, but we do not need another special tax exception written into the state constitution.”

Arguments: Vote Book summary of the official Yes/No wording. Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.

Official ballot wording
Do you support an amendment to allow the surviving spouse of a deceased veteran with a service-connected disability, who receives the additional property tax exemption, to make a one-time transfer of the additional property tax exemption to a subsequent qualifying property? (Effective January 1, 2027) (Amends Article VII, Section 21(K)(1))

Source: Official ballot text (state election office)

Amendment 2 — Property Tax Rate Limits Based on Existing Voter-Approved Maximums Amendment

Amendment 2 would authorize taxing authorities to levy a millage at a rate above the rate set by the previous year's assessment of the maximum amount of taxa…

Plain-English summary (Ballotpedia, secondary source): Amendment 2 would authorize taxing authorities to levy a millage at a rate above the rate set by the previous year's assessment of the maximum amount of taxable property within each parish, but below the maximum permitted by the Louisiana Constitution.

Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording)

A Yes vote means: A "yes" vote supports authorizing taxing authorities to levy a millage at a rate above the rate set by the previous year's assessment of the maximum amount of taxable property within each parish, but below the maximum permitted by the state constitution. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

A No vote means: A "no" vote opposes authorizing taxing authorities to levy a millage at a rate above the rate set by the previous year's assessment of the maximum amount of taxable property within each parish, but below the maximum permitted by the state constitution. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Supporters say: Supporters argue voters should approve it so that the change takes effect: supports authorizing taxing authorities to levy a millage at a rate above the rate set by the previous year's assessment of the maximum amount of taxable property within each parish, but below the maximum permitted by…

Opponents say: Opponents, including The Power Coalition for Equity & Justice, argue: “It would make it easier for property tax rates to go back up. Keep the current rules in place.”

Arguments: Vote Book summary of the official Yes/No wording. Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.

Official ballot wording
Do you support an amendment to allow a local taxing authority to continue to levy a lower millage rate without losing its ability to adjust to the maximum authorized millage rate from a prior year's reassessment?

Source: Official ballot text (state election office)

Amendment 3 — Prohibit Post-Conviction Bail for Individuals Convicted of Assault Against Minors Amendment

The constitutional amendment would prohibit post-conviction bail for a defendant who is convicted of an aggravated offense against a victim who is a minor.

Plain-English summary (Ballotpedia, secondary source): The constitutional amendment would prohibit post-conviction bail for a defendant who is convicted of an aggravated offense against a victim who is a minor.

Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording)

A Yes vote means: A "yes" vote supports prohibiting post-conviction bail for a defendant who is convicted of an aggravated offense, as defined by law, against a victim who is a minor. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

A No vote means: A "no" vote opposes prohibiting post-conviction bail for a defendant who is convicted of an aggravated offense, as defined by law, against a victim who is a minor. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Supporters say: Supporters argue voters should approve it so that the change takes effect: supports prohibiting post-conviction bail for a defendant who is convicted of an aggravated offense, as defined by law, against a victim who is a minor. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Opponents say: Opponents, including The Power Coalition for Equity & Justice, argue: “Judges should be able to look at each case. Our justice system makes mistakes, and appeals are an important part of due process.”

Arguments: Vote Book summary of the official Yes/No wording. Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.

Official ballot wording
Do you support an amendment to prohibit a defendant from being released on any post-conviction bail if the defendant is convicted of an aggravated offense against a minor child? (Adds Article I, Section 18(C))

Source: Official ballot text (state election office)

Amendment 4 — Gubernatorial Two-Term Lifetime Limit Amendment

If approved, a "yes" vote supports changing the gubernatorial term limit from two consecutive terms, which allows a former governor to sit out one term and r…

Plain-English summary (Vote Book, from the official Yes/No wording): If approved, a "yes" vote supports changing the gubernatorial term limit from two consecutive terms, which allows a former governor to sit out one term and run again, to a permanent, lifetime maximum of two terms total. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording)

A Yes vote means: A "yes" vote supports changing the gubernatorial term limit from two consecutive terms, which allows a former governor to sit out one term and run again, to a permanent, lifetime maximum of two terms total. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

A No vote means: A "no" vote opposes amending the Louisiana Constitution to change the gubernatorial term limit, thereby keeping the current limit that prohibits a governor from serving more than two consecutive terms but places no lifetime cap on total terms served. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Supporters say: Supporters, including State Rep. Michael Bayham (R-103), argue: “[HB 225] would guarantee the opportunity for new blood and fresh perspective. The amendment will put distance between the political past that has defined us.”

Opponents say: Opponents, including The Power Coalition for Equity & Justice, argue: “Let the voters decide who they want to elect.”

Arguments: Ballotpedia (secondary source). Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.

Official ballot wording
Do you support an amendment to prohibit a person who has served more than one and one-half terms as governor from being elected as governor for any future term? (Amends Article IV, Section 3(B))

Source: Official ballot text (state election office)

Amendment 5 — Remove Payment Order Requirement for State Retirement System Unfunded Liability Amendment

If approved, a "yes" vote supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to remove the requirement that a state retirement system receiving nonrecurring state…

Plain-English summary (Vote Book, from the official Yes/No wording): If approved, a "yes" vote supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to remove the requirement that a state retirement system receiving nonrecurring state funds apply those funds to its oldest outstanding unfunded accrued liability (UAL) first. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording)

A Yes vote means: A "yes" vote supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to remove the requirement that a state retirement system receiving nonrecurring state funds apply those funds to its oldest outstanding unfunded accrued liability (UAL) first. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

A No vote means: A "no" vote opposes amending the Louisiana Constitution to remove the requirement that a state retirement system receiving nonrecurring state funds apply those funds to its oldest outstanding unfunded accrued liability (UAL) first. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Supporters say: Supporters argue: You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at [email protected].

Opponents say: Opponents, including The Power Coalition for Equity & Justice, argue: “Keep a clear and predictable rule for paying retirement debt.”

Arguments: Ballotpedia (secondary source). Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.

Official ballot wording
Do you support an amendment to authorize a state retirement system to apply any nonrecurring state monies it receives to any of its unfunded accrued liability rather than requiring application to its oldest unfunded accrued liability? (Amends Article VII, Section 10(D)(2)(b)(iii))

Source: Official ballot text (state election office)

Amendment 6 — Property Tax Exemption for Seniors Amendment

If approved, a "yes" vote supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to authorize a property tax exemption up to $30,000 of assessed property value, increa…

Plain-English summary (Vote Book, from the official Yes/No wording): If approved, a "yes" vote supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to authorize a property tax exemption up to $30,000 of assessed property value, increasing with homeowner's age, from taxation for homeowners 65 and older who already qualify for the income-based assessment freeze. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording)

A Yes vote means: A "yes" vote supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to authorize a property tax exemption up to $30,000 of assessed property value, increasing with homeowner's age, from taxation for homeowners 65 and older who already qualify for the income-based assessment freeze. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

A No vote means: A "no" vote opposes amending the Louisiana Constitution to authorize a property tax exemption up to $30,000 of assessed property value, increasing with homeowner's age, from taxation for homeowners 65 and older who already qualify for the income-based assessment freeze. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Supporters say: Supporters argue: You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at [email protected].

Opponents say: Opponents, including The Power Coalition for Equity & Justice, argue: “More property tax exemptions will mean less money for our schools and local services.”

Arguments: Ballotpedia (secondary source). Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.

Official ballot wording
Do you support an amendment to authorize parishes and municipalities to extend an additional property tax exemption for property subject to the homestead exemption that is owned and occupied by a person who is at least sixty-five years of age and who qualifies for the special assessment level? (Effective January 1, 2028) (Adds Article VII, Section 21(P))

Source: Official ballot text (state election office)

Amendment 7 — Use Public Funds for Drinking Water Utility Service Lines Amendment

If approved, a "yes" vote supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to authorize the use of public funds for the maintenance of drinking water utility ser…

Plain-English summary (Vote Book, from the official Yes/No wording): If approved, a "yes" vote supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to authorize the use of public funds for the maintenance of drinking water utility services lines affected by hazardous materials on property owned by utility customers. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording)

A Yes vote means: A "yes" vote supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to authorize the use of public funds for the maintenance of drinking water utility services lines affected by hazardous materials on property owned by utility customers. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

A No vote means: A "no" vote opposes amending the Louisiana Constitution to authorize the use of public funds for the maintenance of drinking water utility services lines affected by hazardous materials on property owned by utility customers. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Supporters say: Supporters, including The Power Coalition for Equity & Justice, argue: “Get dangerous pipes out of our communities and protect families from unsafe drinking water. The federal government has over $150 million available to fix dangerous lead pipes, but it can only be used if this amendment passes.”

Opponents say: Opponents argue: You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at [email protected].

Arguments: Ballotpedia (secondary source). Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.

Official ballot wording
Do you support an amendment to allow for the use of public funds by a political subdivision for the purpose of identifying, inventorying, removing or replacing drinking water utility service lines made of or affected by materials as specified or prescribed by the Lead and Copper Rule Improvements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, promulgated October 30, 2024, or subsequent promulgation, on property owned by utility customers? (Amends Article VII, Section 14)

Source: Official ballot text (state election office)

Amendment 8 — Prohibit Property Expropriation by Foreign Adversaries Amendment

If approved, a "yes" vote supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to prohibit the expropriation of property by foreign adversaries or agents of a foreig…

Plain-English summary (Vote Book, from the official Yes/No wording): If approved, a "yes" vote supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to prohibit the expropriation of property by foreign adversaries or agents of a foreign adversary, as defined by law. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording)

A Yes vote means: A "yes" vote supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to prohibit the expropriation of property by foreign adversaries or agents of a foreign adversary, as defined by law. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

A No vote means: A "no" vote opposes amending the Louisiana Constitution to prohibit the expropriation of property by foreign adversaries or agents of a foreign adversary, as defined by law. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Supporters say: Supporters, including State Rep. Charles Owen (R-30), argue: “[The amendment] would allow citizens, if they want to cordon off their property [to prevent] any possibility of a foreign adversary ever expropriating it.”

Opponents say: Opponents, including The Power Coalition for Equity & Justice, argue: “We don’t need to change the constitution for something that can be handled through regular state law.”

Arguments: Ballotpedia (secondary source). Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.

Official ballot wording
Do you support an amendment to prohibit expropriation of property by a foreign adversary or an agent of a foreign adversary? (Amends Article I, Section 4(B)(4))

Source: Official ballot text (state election office)

Amendment 9 — Raise Income Limit to $150,000 for Special Property Tax Assessment Amendment

Amendment 9 would raise the income limit to qualify for the property tax special assessment level—a provision that freezes the assessed value of a home for e…

Plain-English summary (Ballotpedia, secondary source): Amendment 9 would raise the income limit to qualify for the property tax special assessment level—a provision that freezes the assessed value of a home for eligible homeowners so that their property taxes do not increase due to rising property values—from $100,000 to $150,000.

Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording)

A Yes vote means: A " yes " vote supports raising the income limit to qualify for the property tax special assessment level —a provision that freezes the assessed value of a home for eligible homeowners so that their property taxes do not increase due to rising property values—from $100,000 to $150,000. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

A No vote means: A " no " vote opposes raising the income limit to qualify for the property tax special assessment level , keeping it at $100,000. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Supporters say: Supporters argue: You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at [email protected].

Opponents say: Opponents, including The Power Coalition for Equity & Justice, argue: “Expanding property tax breaks will mean less money for schools and local services.”

Arguments: Ballotpedia (secondary source). Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.

Official ballot wording
Do you support an amendment to increase the maximum amount of income a person may receive and still qualify for the special assessment level for residential property receiving the homestead exemption?

Source: Official ballot text (state election office)

Amendment 10 — Tax Exemption for Rehabilitated Property Amendment

Amendment 10 would provide for an optional tax exemption for derelict or blighted property that has been rehabilitated.

Plain-English summary (Ballotpedia, secondary source): Amendment 10 would provide for an optional tax exemption for derelict or blighted property that has been rehabilitated. The Louisiana State Legislature would be required to pass laws defining blighted and derelict property, and the requirements for the exemption.

Plain-language summary (AI-written; see official wording)

A Yes vote means: A "yes" vote supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to authorize a tax exemption for derelict or blighted property, as defined by the state legislature, that has been rehabilitated. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

A No vote means: A "no" vote opposes amending the Louisiana Constitution to authorize a tax exemption for derelict or blighted property, as defined by the state legislature, that has been rehabilitated. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Supporters say: Supporters argue voters should approve it so that the change takes effect: supports amending the Louisiana Constitution to authorize a tax exemption for derelict or blighted property, as defined by the state legislature, that has been rehabilitated. (Ballotpedia plain-language summary of official ballot measure)

Opponents say: Opponents, including The Power Coalition for Equity & Justice, argue: “Voters should know who gets the tax break, how it works, and how long it lasts before putting it in the constitution.”

Arguments: Vote Book summary of the official Yes/No wording. Listed in equal length; Vote Book does not endorse either side.

Official ballot wording
Do you support an amendment to allow property tax exemptions for blighted or derelict properties that have been rehabilitated, and to require the legislature to enact laws providing for administration of these exemptions? (Effective January 1, 2027) (Adds Article VII, Section 21(P))

Source: Official ballot text (state election office)

Share this guide

Know someone voting? Send them this page.